.
 
 
 Web  KCTribune 
900-Foot Walk for Transit Daunting for Some Riders
Union Station
UNION STATION SIGNBOARD -- THE GROUNDS IN FRONT OF THE STATION ARE BEING USED TO PROMOTE LIGHT RAIL, BUT LIGHT RAIL WILL NOT STOP AT UNION STATION. TRYING TO ILLUSTRATE THAT FACT PATRICK TOUHEY AND BOB LEWELLEN OF THE COMMITTEE FOR SENSIBLE TRANSIT HOLD UP THEIR SIGN.
Credit:  Michael McClure
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

By Tom Bogdon

Andi Udris, CEO of Union Station, does not believe it would be an imposition on future commuter rail passengers to ask them to walk 900 feet—the length of three football fields—twice a day to board the light rail line east of the station on Grand Blvd.

“They’d be willing to walk that far in Europe,” Udris said. Udris flourished a City Council ordinance that had been amended by Councilman Russ Johnson to include the provision, “Section 5. That it is the intention of the City of Kansas City that Union Station will be served by light rail.”

Asked what that meant, Udris acknowledged that it probably meant that Union Station would be accessible to the light rail system by means of a one-way 900-foot walk from Main Street to Grand Blvd.

Councilman Johnson, chairman of the Council’s Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and Mark Huffer, General Manager of the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, have made it clear that the preferred route is down Grand Blvd. through Hallmark Cards, Inc.’s Crown Center office and retail development.

Hallmark participated actively in the planning process and made a $15,000 contribution to Citizens for Light Rail, which is backing the plan and sales tax.

KCTribune interviewed Udris in connection with a news release issued this week by the Committee for Sensible Transit, which opposes the 3/8-cent light rail sales tax on the Nov. 4 ballot. Committee for Sensible Transit questioned the numerous signs in front of Union Station supporting the light rail initiative, in view of the fact that the light rail line will run on Grand Blvd., 900 feet east of Union Station.

Udris, who said he authorized the numerous yard signs in front of Union Station and also pro-light rail signs at the information counter inside Union Station, said he did so because he was anxious to get light rail started even if the light rail station that would serve Union Station was 900 feet distant from Union Station.
Like many Kansas Citians, Udris sees Union Station as a potential future hub for commuter rail that would run on existing rights-of-way from the station to such suburban destinations as Olathe, Blue Springs, Hickman Mills and Grandview.

However, Many such transit advocates cite the poor connections between suburban trains at Union Station and the proposed new billion-dollar, 14-mile light rail line as one more reason to vote against the proposal.

Therefore, the Committee for Sensible Transit sent out a news release which stated:

“Union Station has a lot of trains. There are model trains in the lobby, restored trains in the basement, and working trains in the yard. But there is one train that won’t ever come to Union Station—light rail. Despite this, the lawn in front of the station is littered with pro-light rail campaign signs.

“HNTB engineers and the KCATA have explicitly rejected a Main Street route for light rail (past Union Station). You wouldn’t guess that by driving past Union Station, which recently underwent a publicly funded $100 million restoration. “Wow. Union Station may itself be the most expensive campaign billboard in the city.”

Bob Lewellen, a former Kansas City Council member, mayoral contender, and Parks and Recreation commissioner, who is now a member of the Committee for Sensible Transit, had this to say about all the signs: “The signs would communicate to the public that the beloved Union Station is going to be an integral part of the light rail system. That is highly misleading.”

Dennis O’Neill, who was an appointee to the Citizens Light Rail Task Force, which advised HNTB Corp. in the planning process, and now is a member of the Committee for Sensible Transit, said: “The real deception here is using Union Station property for light rail signs when it’s (light rail) is not going to go there. It’s going to be on Grand.

“Udris needs to start riding public transit so he can understand why a working guy wouldn’t want to start walking 900 to 1,000 feet twice a day on top of his usual commute,” O’Neill said.

O’Neill noted that the Country Club streetcar line ran on Main Street until streetcars were removed in the late 1950s. At their peak, streetcars carried 350,000 Kansas City passengers per day. The County Club streetcar line ran immediately adjacent to Union Station, as buses do today. There was no walking 900 feet to catch a streetcar.

Post A Comment
* Indicates required information
Comment Title:
* Comments:
Nickname:
* Validation:
Comments 9 comments for this article
Page:   <<  <   1   >  >>
Added: October 23, 2008. 07:29 PM CDT
Udris is a liar, thief, criminal and con man. The best place to run light rail is right up his ass!
Anonymous
Added: October 23, 2008. 11:23 AM CDT
We Ain't in Europe, Andi
You crack me up, Andri Udris. This is Kansas City, not London or Paris. IF we were EVER to build a light rail line, do you know what would happen? The city or utilities or contractor would immediately tear up the construction because of some flaw in the design. This is the Kansas City Way.
KC Native
Added: October 19, 2008. 11:32 PM CDT
The "future 100 miles of routes" promissed in the ads will cost much more than half a trillion dollars. Todays costs are around 91 million. Add inflation and you come up with at least a trillion dollars. Can't blame Washington for this mess. Vote NO. It is the wrong time to try this.
Anonymous
Added: October 19, 2008. 11:32 PM CDT
The "future 100 miles of routes" promissed in the ads will cost much more than half a trillion dollars. Todays costs are around 91 million. Add inflation and you come up with at least a trillion dollars. Can't blame Washington for this mess. Vote NO. It is the wrong time to try this.
Anonymous
Added: October 19, 2008. 11:18 PM CDT
Light rail is not fast transportation. It moves on average 17 miles an hour. It runs in traffic. Why pay 91 million a mile for going no faster than the automobiles along side. This speed information was presented by the engineers hired by the KSATA. The information was presented to the Light Rail Taskforce. Lots of unanswered questions. Lets solve our sewer problem first.


Anonymous
Added: October 19, 2008. 01:40 PM CDT
Forget Union Station! Forget the Route!
You are not voting on any of that. You are voting on a start and a stop and 25 years of paying a new tax.
Everything else you see or hear is all manufactured to convince you to vote for an incomplete plan with a lot of backdoor agreements between developers.
The stuff you get in the mail shows over a hundred miles of "future" Light rail. At the present cost that will cost half a TRILLION Dollars. If you believe any of the hype enough to vote for it you will get what you deserve --screwed.
Anonymous
Added: October 17, 2008. 04:50 PM CDT
Positive Reasons for Voting Yes
1. Cars powered by clean burning coal fired power plants.
2. Immutable route set in concrete leads to flexibility.
3. Duplicates existing transportation systems.
4. No firm route.
5. No firm ridership figures.
6. Will disrupt commerce along the route during construction aiding businesses already facing a recession.
7. Already a big boost to budget draining in St. Louis.
8. Guaranteed to run $200,000,000 over budget.
9. Oh heck, that's enough VOTE YES.
DKC
Added: October 17, 2008. 03:33 PM CDT
too far to walk
why do we even need light rail? people don't like walking in KC anyway.

cows4kc.blogspot.com
chris
Added: October 17, 2008. 03:01 PM CDT
Liars
Once again Union Station is involved in bait and switch political schemes. Last time that happened we got the boondoggle that is science city.
Steve G
Page:   <<  <   1   >  >>
Google